Awaiting reviewer assignment after under review sample. 12 Awaiting AE Recommendation 1.

Awaiting reviewer assignment after under review sample Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. Follow edited Dec 5, 2017 at 4:11. I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). I've had over 40 reviewer declines on one manuscript, all because they are too busy. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". A very painful situation for After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. This change has occurred I have recently resubmitted a piece of 2nd R&R "provisional acceptance, review required". Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. The paper status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment". COVID has had detrimental impacts on higher ed capacity. Peer review The Editor decides whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. It is likely that it isn't going out for peer review after all? If they do reject it without review, that week delay the paper was probably on the AE's to 2023. 5. It’s only when the status changes to ‘Under Review,’ as you have rightly The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a . It means that the AE has performed To mitigate these challenges, solutions for automated association of papers with "well matching" reviewers - the task often referred to as reviewer assignment problem (RAP) - have been the subject Sometimes, a reviewer may pull out after being assigned, for reasons of a lack of time, mismatch (with their subject area), or conflict of interest. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. However, the status changed to ‘Assigning for review’ for about a week and then changed to ‘Under review’ again, this time for about a week. The first time I contacted was when a whole year was passed Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 28 days to complete the assignment. Conference Ranking. If that was the case for your paper, then a subsequent change to "Awaiting reviewer invitation" would mean that the editor is sending your paper for an additional review. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? After almost three weeks of "Awaiting reviewer assignment" status, it changes to "Reviewers contacted". Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the The paper status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment". After that, it changed to "under review" but now, after 20 days, again it changed to At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". Although I understand this isn’t a long period of time in the grand scheme, for the past two months the paper’s status has cyclically changed from “awaiting reviewer assignment” to “awaiting reviewer selection”. I submitted my manuscript via ScholarOne and within 2 days my status went from "editor assigned" to "under review". " Does this mean that my manuscript needs to go through another round of review? The "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" status is when a submission is under review. Does this mean that the paper has passed the editorial Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" All of this happened today and I only submitted the article 2 weeks ago. Especially if you are unsure about how to formulate your feedback. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. my status shows that after the first I submitted my manuscript to a journal. Awaiting AE Assignment状态的持续时间一般1-3天左右。 (4)Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: 当稿件被SE分配到了某一AE后，状态变为under review，AE开始邀请审稿人之后，稿件状态立刻变为Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. Chaos~ PaperSeeker 2022-06-01 My paper was under review for two days and now is ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’. These are relatively simple. You will be in a better frame of mind to appreciate exactly what is being said. Please note that I have a time restriction for getting an official review. 07. How to handle situation in which the article has been "Awaiting reviewer assignment" for 5 months? 3. However, I just noticed that the status of my My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. Now, it shows Awaiting Decision. ) I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer assignment'. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. Country Ranking 12. After that, it changed to 'Under Review. This status typically means your manuscript is awaiting assignment to an editor after the initial review of the submission. ' However, after 15 days, it again changed to 'Reviewers Assigned. Sometimes, after the first round, a reviewer notices sometimes more important, and can ask for a major revision (or a reject). When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. The first update, ADM: [a person’s name], means that the manuscript was first in administrative (shortened to ‘ADM’) processing, which is the typical first stage after submission. ' Is it under review again or has the editor not seen my paper? Could you please clarify? Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? Answered by Editage Insights on 16 Mar It is really hard to get reviewers right now so patience is key. Awaiting Editor Decision. I submitted a paper on April 8. user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. In case ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ happened earlier, they initially decided to send it for review, but changed their mind, and decided to 2023. This change has occurred This status typically means your manuscript is awaiting assignment to an editor after the initial review of the submission. 2, the assignment result of reviewers to papers determines the expertise of the reviewer who will review the paper, hence it is the crucial step in the whole peer review process. Any thoughts? Once the requisite number of reviewers accept the invitation, the status will change to "under review. The first time I contacted was when a whole year was passed without even a single response. After the ADM had been assigned, I remember seeing "reviewer assignment" and "reviewer In another example, I would complain if my paper is still not under review after one month, but it’s fine if it is under review at that time. Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the invitation (because they have a conflict of First of all, the third line up from the bottom, “Waiting for Reviewer Assignment,” really shouldn’t be there. This April, we received the reviewer's response and resubmitted after correction on May 18. Awaiting reviewer scores --> self-explanatory; Reviews completed --> self-explanatory; With editor --> this may occur early in the review process, indicating the article is under desk review by relevant editor(s), My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a Most likely the assigned reviewer agreed to review but then didn't provide a review, declined to review, or provided a review that made the editor think another review is required. Under Review lists all manuscripts waiting for reviews to come in from Reviewers. This has happened several times. It is just part of the way that resubmissions get routed through the GEMS system. 28 Submitted, Awaiting Editorial Office Processing 2023. 04. This change has occurred That could be because the system requires four reviewers, but the editor has only gotten the commitment from three people to review the paper. However, now in August the status of the manuscript has remained "Awaiting EIC decision" for more than a few days. 一般在一周以内，看审稿人的回复速度； Especially the status 'Under review' encompasses many steps; while it may appear your manuscript is not progressing through the editorial process, a lot of activities may be happening during this part of the review process. Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. The peer review process is very likely double anonymous, so you don't know who your reviewers are, and they don't know who you are. This change has occurred As a reviewer, you are obligated to maintain the confidentiality of both the paper you are reviewing and also of your review. Research Trend. ""Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. c. 2022/06/12 Under review 2022/06/13 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2011/06/28 No updates. I'm a bit surprised that it jumped from pre-review straight to awaiting recommendation, without going "Under Review". Insufficient overall quality of manuscript submission. This change has occurred Hi everyone, I am a bit confused and wanted to bug you about something. I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial office for assessment. After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. A major revision was submitted to a journal. On the last step I’ve seen it stay for months because some DEs are sitting on the paper. Decision notification e-mails and what they mean. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". 04 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2023 The editors are reading it and checking their reviewer list. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. Revise. Humanities I received a revise and resubmit decision in mid-July. After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. 09 under review 12. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural A second example table I’ll show you is one where the paper was eventually accepted: Specifically, you can see that it did not go out for review but rather the editor decided on acceptance purely from reading the responses to I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. Now, the status has changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. Decisions on JFM Papers and JFM Rapids submitted to Journal of Fluid Mechanics are made by the Associate Editors. As stated by Rodriguez, Bollen, and Van de Sompel (2007): “one of the first and potentially most important stage is the one that attempts to distribute submitted 20220810 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment - Waiting for reviewer assignment on August 10, 2022. The EiC at that time said they'll look I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. Editor and/or reviewer comments, and further instructions. It passed the initial evaluation 10 days later. With a typical ScholarOne configuration, "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that it is actually out with (at least some) reviewers, while "Under Review" would instead mean the previous stage, where it is being considered by the handling editor(s) and might still be rejected without review. But only after two days under review the status changed to “Awaiting AE Recommendation”. This change has occurred For instance, if ‘Awaiting Final Decision’ happened earlier, it may mean the AE first decided to refer their decision to the EIC, but changed their mind, and then decided to send it for review. Therefore, I may suggest experts of the field to help the process, if you are still seeking reviewers. Improve this question. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". Last December, I submitted my paper to a Springer Nature journal. This folder will be marked with a red arrow as long as there are I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. Then, it was updated to ‘Reviewers Assigned’ in about two weeks. I submitted my manuscript to Management Science. Then after a week or so, it changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Score(s)" and same day it changed back to "Under Review". I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. As can be inferred from Fig. Most likely the assigned reviewer agreed to review but then didn't provide a review, declined to review, or provided a review that made the editor think another review is required. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. What does this mean? Will it go for review? AE stands for "Associate Editor. Take time to reflect Put the comments to one side for a few days, then come back to them. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". ' Now, after three weeks, the status date of the manuscript has changed, but the status remains 'Reviewers Assigned. But my question is as below. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. But today suddenly the status changed back to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ again. Ranking . After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. San San. I have contacted the editor in chief (EiC) a few times regarding this. 15 Awaiting EIC decision 3. Immediately after submission, one ADM was assigned, but MAL ADM (an abbreviation that is not known to me) was not assigned, and the status was ‘Under review. 06. 1. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting acceptance to review Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: A number of reviewers have accepted to review, but the number is Role of the reviewer. After half a day, the status changed to ‘Under Review. Some editorial systems give the status as with editors, awaiting reviewer assignment (or similar) if a new referee needs to be assigned and no other referee is currently Excuse me, this status awaiting reviewer assignment lasted for 2 and a half months, what is the situation, is this under review? - IEEE Transactions on Magnetics Forum Forum. 15 Awaiting EIC decision 1. Now, it has changed to ‘Assigning for Once the manuscript completes this initial check, it is sent for a peer review, which is typically indicated by ‘Under Review. The author does not know the identity of the reviewers, but the reviewers know the identity of the author. 6. If the After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. Authors do not know specifics, they don't know for how many reviewers the submission was sent, their deadlines and if they are overdue. What does this mean? Please help. However, a strange observation is that On July 12 the status was Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting EIC Decision Does it mean rejection? Becoming a Peer Reviewer; Career Advice for researchers; Mental Health. The Editor has made a decision and requested you I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Once a paper is submitted to a journal, authors eagerly wait for the editorial decision. The status of the paper was 'Submitted. To provide insights into the peer review process, many journals provide detailed review protocols for their peer reviewers. 21 accepted Translation: 8. I was thrilled because I thought that might mean I'll get an answer Since it is passed [duration] months after the expected response time, I would like to ask the status of my paper, which is currently under review. ' On May 21, our paper's status changed to 'Editorial assignment pending. What does this indicate? I submitted a research paper to a journal. I myself have had I submitted a manuscript to a medical science journal. So, now it's in the normal process of the Editor assessing the reviews. I submitted my manuscript to a journal from 1 month ago in scholar one. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? @scaaahu My only guess is that the Editor invited some reviewers, not all of which accepted. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 The number of times your manuscript status has changed to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and then back to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ reflects the challenge the editor is having in getting the requisite number of After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. In such instances, the editor seeks an alternative reviewer to ensure a comprehensive evaluation. . 摸鱼ing? 2022-06-27 This D journal is like this, insisting on self-destruction. ’ However, 14 days later, it changed to ‘Reviewers Invited. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. For example, the editor or the editor's It’s quite common for editors to select a lot of reviewers, but only invite a few at a time. Instead of the normal process streamline in the Editorial Manager that usually goes through "with editor-reviewer invited-under review-reject/accept", mine has gone into "awaiting reviewer assignment-reviewer assigned" and haven't heard from them for a month. " This status has not been changed for a month. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor has to look for other reviewers. So the editor may add another reviewer, to settle the case. As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". But how does the editor actually take the decision on a manuscript? This article explains the sequence of events that lead from peer review to editorial decision making: how the AE procures the completed reviews, assesses them, and finally comes to a decision on whether to After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. What does this change mean? Does it mean that one of the selected reviewers has declined the invitation? Is it a bad sign? The status of my submission is still "awaiting assignment". Your article Awaiting Editor Assignment: While this typically means that the manuscript is awaiting assignment to an AE, in this case, it probably means it is awaiting assignment to a peer reviewer. 23 minor revision 1. Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘Under Review. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. This change Explore the transition in manuscript status from 'Under Review' to 'Reviewers Assigned. Then, there was a call for reviewers, and the status changed to ‘Reviewers Invited. " Good luck Awaiting reviewer invitation for 6 weeks after submitting revision. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. But today suddenly the status changed back to 交流中心 › 分类: 投稿 › Awaiting AE Recommendation 要多久？ 0 赞 踩 iRobot 管理员提问于 4 年 前 我初次投稿后，编辑部拒稿了，但给了根据审稿意见修改后重投的建议。我的修改稿重投后，很快进入 under review 状态；1 个月后变成 Awaiting Associate Editor Recommendation，至目前，此状态已持续了 3 周，我大概 If the date changes and it’s still under review means that less than two accepted and others have been invited. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. 30 awaiting reviewer assignment 2. So, keep up your hope and wait for the status to change to "Under review. 19 Awaiting Decision 2023. 5 awaiting reviewer scores 3. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. From your query, it seems reviewers have been assigned for your manuscript. The latter happened to me once as a guest editor. However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. Depending on the journal's workflow, this status could also indicate when the editorial office determines if your submission is eligible for peer review. These protocols can function as detailed flow charts to guide the review of each submission, or authors may see the status “Awaiting EIC Assignment”. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. An initial assessment will be performed, and the Associate Editor may reject without Could it change from Awaiting AE assignment to Under Review directly without AE being assigned ? peer-review; Share. 01 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2023. " Does it mean that my paper will go through another round of review with new reviewers? I was told that for paper with "minor revision," it is likely like it will not be sent back to the reviewers. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again To mitigate these challenges, solutions for automated association of papers with "well matching" reviewers - the task often referred to as reviewer assignment problem (RAP) - have been the subject Relatedly, does under review mean that the AE has sent to referees or just that AE has been assigned? As I recall, it switches to showing Awaiting reviewer scores, the. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. The manuscript status has changed from "awaiting reviewer scores" back to "under review". EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. 05. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". awaiting AE decision, then Awaiting DE decision. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. More than two years in a journal. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. I have submitted an article to a JCR-indexed journal in November and in March, following the request of the journal, I submitted a revised version that contained changes to the introduction and literature review. • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". San. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". a) Is it Potential Reviewer Agreed to Review: 20-May-2018 02:30:05: Potential Reviewer Invitation(s) Sent Potential Reviewers Selected: 19-May-2018 22:04:49: Reviewer Assignment Started: 14-May-2018 00:20:23: Additional Reviewers Needed: 14-May-2018 00:20:23: Potential Reviewer Declined to Review: 13-May-2018 20:35:14: Awaiting Author Adjustment The manuscript has been resubmitted and has been under review for 24 days with no result yet. 13 AE Recommendation 3. After the review scores come back, a manuscript then So, why the sudden shift from 'under review' to 'reviewers assigned'? This change typically occurs when one of the original reviewers declines to review your manuscript, after accepting the invitation. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. 01 Under review 2023. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the status changes to "Under review. The status changed to admin check to under review after one week. I was wondering about the Reviewers: 30 days after the assignment; AEs: Ten weeks after the assignment; If the paper is indeed under review by the other journal, then the paper shall be rejected, and the authors should be warned that this is an unacceptable practice. t backed up) Scenario 2: awaiting reviewer selection>> under review If this was the way the status had changed, then it is possible that the online status tracking software uses the status "awaiting reviewer selection" to indicate that the paper is with the editor. ED1 said major, ED2 said minor. Journal of Fluid Mechanics uses a single-anonymous model of peer review. After one week, the status changed to 'Reviewers Assigned,' and it remained so for one day. 28 Resubmitted, Awaiting Editorial Office Processing 2023. in getting a review from a particular reviewer who already agreed to review a paper, having too Generally, the status changes to "Awaiting ED recommendations" once peer review for the paper is done and the reviewer comments have come in. While this typically means that the manuscript is awaiting peer review, because the status changed so quickly after submission, this probably refers to the internal review, which is about aspects such as a match with the journal’s scope, the quality of the writing/presentation, and the research at a basic level. What does awaiting reviewer assignment mean under review? Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Journal Matcher. " Does it really mean that my paper will go through another round of review with new reviewers? 2022/10/13 submit, Awaiting AE Assignment 2022/10/17 Status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/2/12 Status: Major Revision 2023/3/27 Major revision submission, Status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2023/3/19 Status: Under review 2023/5/26 Status: Accept The review process took a long time, a total of 225 days, but I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). This caused the system to stuck in "Awaiting reviewer Assignment". What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" I submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal using the ScholarOne system. (Which the editor may deem enough, and so the status will never change until the three reviews have been received. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again What does awaiting reviewer assignment mean under review? Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. How should this double status be interpreted? Is the revised manuscript with The manuscript status was updated to ‘Under Review’ in a month after submission. There are several decisions that authors may receive after submitting their paper to one of the Society's journals: Reject wit Under review --> some journals seem to use this for every stage of peer review. ’. However, this change should not be cause for I am afraid it does not forebode reassurance when a paper such as yours, after being duly revised and resubmitted, changes its status from 'under review' to 'awaiting reviewer assignment'. What does "Awaiting Assignment to Batch" mean? 1. Report the results at a later date after a longer follow-up period. Then in 3 weeks it was "awaiting reviewer reports" and yesterday finally "awaiting editorial decision". I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. It’s only when the status changes to ‘Under Review,’ as you have rightly understood, that the actual review begins. This refers to the internal check by the journal, for basic aspects such as novelty of the research, quality of the writing, scope match, and adherence to the journal Because the editor requested 2 reviewers for this paper (the default for JGR-Space Physics), the status of the paper reverts back to “Contacting” because the system still desires another reviewer. If not, it will become "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" until now, and I don't know if it has been reviewed or not. In another example, I would complain if my paper is still not under review after one month, but it’s fine if it is under review at that time. Is that the only reason the date changes? I have heard that if the editor accesses the reviewers coments and when a reviewer send his comments the date changes also. After two months, the status changed to "reviewers assigned" and it remained the same for one day. 30 Reject (Resubmission Allowed) 2023. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. I I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. Under Review: This status means that the manuscript is under Each reviewer is normally allowed 28 days to submit his or her report, but may occasionally be Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have Under review: The paper is with reviewers for comment or waiting for the Action Editor’s decision. In this case, you will notice that the duration of Under Review is relatively short for 1-2 weeks. 11 awaiting reviewer assignment 12. Peer-reviewing an academic manuscript is not an easy task. 29 awaiting Hi. Sometimes, a reviewer may pull out after being assigned, for reasons of a lack of time, mismatch (with their subject area), or conflict of interest. I thought this meant the external review. 27 submit & under review 1. ’ So far, so good. This change has occurred About 2 months ago I submitted a paper of mine to a journal via the “scholar-one” submission platform. Depending on the journal's workflow, this status could also indicate when the editorial office determines if Awaiting Reviewer Assignment lists all manuscripts for which Reviewers need to be chosen and invited. What does this mean? If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will start and the status will change to "Under review. 245 5 5 silver badges 11 11 bronze badges. IEEE Policy on Reviewers Using AI: Information or content contained in or about a manuscript under review shall not be processed through a public platform (directly or indirectly) for AI generation of text for a review. RERzeng 2023-06-10 it directly shows "under review". " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. This change After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. In other words, at this point, the ball is squarely in the reviewers’ court! It sounded like their "under review" meant basically "Under Editor's Review". Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of Does it mean your paper will go through another round of review? Not necessarily. So, there is a second “Under Review” line item above this, indicating the time that a second person agreed to review the manuscript. Mental Health in Academia then the EIC would be the one to evaluate the manuscript. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. Can you confirm? Edit: in my case, it is for a revised paper. 14 awaiting reviewer scores 1. Then, the other reviewers submitted their reviews and the Editor decided to go with these reviews only. They gave until 8/3 to submit my revisions, but I didn’t need all that time and I submitted my revisions on 7/27. ' I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. The status of the paper changed several times. – Wrzlprmft ♦ Commented Jul 8, 2015 at 6:41 After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". This change has occurred For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. May I ask if this is normal? How to react to this editor response after a long fruitless review phase? 2. But this could be because the I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. So, now, you need I submitted my manuscript to a journal. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? publications; peer-review; journal-workflow; There are a number of possibilities. Editorial decisions The decision on a manuscript is made by (1) Some journals carry an internal review firstly before sending the manuscript for external review. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. This rather ambiguous stage is when reviewers have been invited, but we are waiting for the required number to agree to review. ' Gain insights into why reviewer changes occur and decode updates throughout the submission The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. After round 2, ED1 said OK, ED2 said reject. Examples of reviewer comments can help!Here you can find an overview of sample comments and examples for the most common review decisions: ‘minor revisions’, ‘major revisions’, ‘revise and resubmit’ and ‘reject’ decisions. ’ My paper underwent a revision. What does this status change mean? (AE) looked around for one or more peer reviewers, was able to find one/them, and has now assigned new reviewer(s) to your manuscript. ’ Just a few hours later, another ADM was assigned, but the status is the same. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. Everything is delayed. Regardless of all reviews beung on time or overdue (even if only one of them are), authors still only see "Awaiting Reviewer Scores Hi. The status was ‘Assigning to editors’ for three days and then ‘Under review’ for a month. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. Editor Assigned Pending to Reviews Completed in Less Than a Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. But today suddenly the status changed back to I have experienced a confusing situation. Manuscript Generator. I didnt see the "under review I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. After a couple of days, the status changed from "Awaiting AE assignment" to "Under Review". Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. Toolbox . ’ As it has been two months since submission, it seems the manuscript has cleared the initial check and is currently undergoing peer review. My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. 04 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2023 I submitted a paper to a journal that uses the ScholarOne submission system. Awaiting EIC decision must have appeared after the first status while you did not check your status! It Appearing after short interval of awaiting reviewer assignment clearly means that associate editors have advised against it! Now the EIC has to make decision. asked Dec 5, 2017 at 3:01. 12 Awaiting AE Recommendation 1. nkzhxxk alkr ejfepb svvc eowmc cmkiw ialycal gfgzuq yszb fpalf